Home › Videos › Step-5-Preview Tested: A Rocket Game With No Rocket
9 Oct 2026 · 2 runs · 2 models
Step-5-Preview Tested: A Rocket Game With No Rocket
StepFun's Step 5 Preview scored 6.5 through OpenRouter, from six of the eight core pages, and tied Claude Sonnet 5.5 on two tests. Its rocket game had no rocket. The two tests that failed scored 7.4 each when re-run through OpenCode Go.
The results
The same scores as the leaderboard: a test that failed is left out of its run's score, not counted as zero. Time, tokens and cost cover each whole run, wildcards included.
Ranking
Quality v1 over measured non-wildcard pages. Different workloads: browse the outputs and coverage before comparing models.
Score against output tokens
Quality v1 against full-run tokens. Different workloads and hardware affect this comparison.
Output tokens include the model's thinking. Like the time, tokens and cost table, it counts every test the model took, wildcards included. A hollow dot is not an exact count: some tests reported none, or the count was worked out from the length of the output. The score axis is zoomed to the data.
Score against time
Quality v1 against full-run time. Different workloads and hardware affect this comparison.
Time is how long the model took to answer, added up over its tests; judging is not counted. Like the time, tokens and cost table, it counts every test the model took, wildcards included. The score axis is zoomed to the data.
Where each model is strong and weak
One row per model, one column per test and per scoring criterion.
| By test | By what the judges scored | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Aero Lab | Jet Odyssey | Blast Island | Launch Day | Alex Optics | Afterburner | Hangar Planner | Rotor Rampage | Working behaviour | Visual quality | Engineering quality | Usability / accessibility | |
| step-5-preview-freeeffort: high | — | — | — | — | 7.4 | 7.4 | — | — | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.3 | 6.3 | |
| stepfun/step-5-previeweffort: high | 5.8 | 7.2 | 6.4 | 4.7 | failed | failed | 7.2 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 6.3 | 6.6 | 5.5 | |
Time, tokens and cost
What each model used across all its tests, wildcards included.
| Model | Tests | Time | Output tokens | Speed | Cost | Subscription used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| step-5-preview-freeeffort: highStepFun | 2 | 2h 08m | 252k134k of it thinking | 32.8 tok/s | — | — |
| stepfun/step-5-previeweffort: highStepFun | 92 failed | 5h 16m | ≥1.07M | 77.4 tok/s | ≥≈$6.24API price, est. | — |
Read from the account's usage window in whole percentage points, so a short run can show 0 points. It counts everything the account did in that time, not only this run.
Runs in this video
Every run behind the numbers. Scores name their comparison basis.
step-5-preview-freeeffort: high
StepFun · 7.4 / 10 · Quality v1 · 2/2 pages · 2h 08m · —
7.4
7.4
stepfun/step-5-previeweffort: high
StepFun · 6.5 / 10 · Quality v1 · 6/8 pages · 5h 16m · ≥≈$6.24 partial quality coverage
5.8
7.2
6.4
4.7
7.2
7.7
6.4