gpt-6-astraeffort: highOpenAI · 3 Oct 2026
7.5 / 10Quality v1 · 8/8 pages
Time3h 31m
Output tokens322k
Cost≈$31.69API price, est.
Home › Videos › Meta Muse Wonder Tested: Is Meta Finally Frontier?
12 Oct 2026 · 3 runs · 3 models
Meta Muse Wonder Tested: Is Meta Finally Frontier?
Meta's first frontier model, tested on launch day at maximum effort. On the five tests it finished, Muse Wonder scored 6.86, fourth of 16 models, behind GPT-6 Astra, Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5. It costs the same per token as Opus 5.5 but wrote far fewer tokens, so each test cost about $2.17 against Opus's $5.89. It scored below Opus on four of the five.
The results
The same scores as the leaderboard: a test that failed is left out of its run's score, not counted as zero. Time, tokens and cost cover each whole run, wildcards included.
Ranking
Quality v1 over measured non-wildcard pages. Different workloads: browse the outputs and coverage before comparing models.
0510
Score against output tokens
Quality v1 against full-run tokens. Different workloads and hardware affect this comparison.
Claude OpusGPT AstraMuse Wonder
Output tokens include the model's thinking. Like the time, tokens and cost table, it counts every test the model took, wildcards included. A hollow dot is not an exact count: some tests reported none, or the count was worked out from the length of the output. The score axis is zoomed to the data.
Score against time
Quality v1 against full-run time. Different workloads and hardware affect this comparison.
Claude OpusGPT AstraMuse Wonder
Time is how long the model took to answer, added up over its tests; judging is not counted. Like the time, tokens and cost table, it counts every test the model took, wildcards included. A hollow dot is a lower bound: some tests have no time recorded. The score axis is zoomed to the data.
Where each model is strong and weak
One row per model, one column per test and per scoring criterion.
| By test | By what the judges scored | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Aero Lab | Jet Odyssey | Blast Island | Launch Day | Alex Optics | Afterburner | Hangar Ops | Hangar Planner | Rotor Rampage | Working behaviour | Visual quality | Engineering quality | Usability / accessibility | |
| gpt-6-astraeffort: high | 7.8 | 7.6 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 7.8 | — | 7.3 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 6.7 | 6.3 | |
| claude-opus-5-5effort: high | 7.7 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 6.0 | 8.3 | 7.4 | — | 7.9 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 6.9 | 6.2 | |
| meta/muse-wondereffort: max | 7.4 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 7.3 | failed | — | — | — | 7.7 | 7.3 | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Violet is strong, orange is weak, on the same 0–10 scale in every cell.Different prompts and protocols: no best-in-column verdict.
Time, tokens and cost
What each model used across all its tests, wildcards included.
| Model | Tests | Time | Output tokens | Speed | Cost | Subscription used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-6-astraeffort: highOpenAI | 9 | 3h 31m | 322k75k of it thinking | 25.4 tok/s | ≈$31.69API price, est. | — |
| claude-opus-5-5effort: highAnthropic | 8 | 3h 29m | 1.30M753k of it thinking | 103.0 tok/s | $36.60API price | 5-hour window not comparable7-day window +2 pts |
| meta/muse-wondereffort: maxMeta | 61 failed | ≥57m 25s | ≥228k106k of it thinking | 66.2 tok/s | ≥≈$10.84API price, est. | — |
≈ An estimate: the provider reported no count, so it is worked out from the length of the output (about 4 characters a token).
— Not measured.
Cost says how it was worked out: charged by the provider, at API prices (for a subscription), or no API charge on local hardware. ≥ means some tests had no price.
Read from the account's usage window in whole percentage points, so a short run can show 0 points. It counts everything the account did in that time, not only this run.
Runs in this video
Every run behind the numbers. Scores name their comparison basis.
Model
Score / basis
Time
Output tokens
Cost
claude-opus-5-5effort: highAnthropic · 3 Oct 2026
7.4 / 10Quality v1 · 8/8 pages
Time3h 29m
Output tokens1.30M
Cost$36.60API price
6.9 / 10Quality v1 · 5/6 pages
Time≥57m 25s
Output tokens≥228k
Cost≥≈$10.84API price, est.
gpt-6-astraeffort: high
OpenAI · 7.5 / 10 · Quality v1 · 8/8 pages · 3h 31m · ≈$31.69
7.8
Aero Lab
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
24m 35s · 36k tokens · ≈$4.30
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.5 · Visual quality 8.5 · Engineering quality 7.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 1e8e809e8caeb2ba
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
6.0/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.6
Jet Odyssey
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
32m 29s · 48k tokens · ≈$6.16
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 8.5 · Engineering quality 6.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt eaf6eace42027b11
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
6.6/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.0
Blast Island
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
23m 42s · 35k tokens · ≈$4.04
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 8.0 · Engineering quality 5.5 · Usability / accessibility 5.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 28ba22cd0f56ca1e
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
6.7/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.1
Launch Day
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
38m 12s · 56k tokens · ≈$7.01
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 8.0 · Engineering quality 6.0 · Usability / accessibility 5.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt d1e76d48a7ac8eb6
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
5.8/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.8
Alex Optics
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
23m 34s · 35k tokens · ≈$2.33
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 8.3 · Engineering quality 7.4 · Usability / accessibility 7.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt de7c304e41dd3505
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
7.5/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.8
Afterburner
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
29m 39s · 34k tokens · ≈$2.39
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.5 · Visual quality 8.5 · Engineering quality 7.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt e08d0617005c33f9
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
8.2/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.3
Hangar Planner
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
8m 07s · 23k tokens · ≈$1.65
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 7.0 · Engineering quality 8.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.0Fixed 16 of 16 bugs · 14 of 14 features still work · 545 lines changedscored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 14deca81c8b3a6c9
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
9.0/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.8
Rotor Rampage
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
22m 30s · 33k tokens · ≈$2.28
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.5 · Visual quality 8.7 · Engineering quality 6.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt d196c18e5127f818
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
7.2/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.4
Unzip the Desertwildcard
gpt-6-astra · effort: high
8m 53s · 24k tokens · ≈$1.55
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 8.3 · Engineering quality 6.3 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 8a3d9f5098d4145f
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
6.9/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
claude-opus-5-5effort: high
Anthropic · 7.4 / 10 · Quality v1 · 8/8 pages · 3h 29m · $36.60
7.7
Aero Lab
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
44m 00s · 261k tokens · $6.50
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 8.5 · Engineering quality 7.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 3ef604ea3997fb42
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
7.6/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.0
Jet Odyssey
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
28m 34s · 175k tokens · $5.50
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 7.5 · Visual quality 7.5 · Engineering quality 6.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 14bd7252a809672d
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
6.8/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.5
Blast Island
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
37m 24s · 239k tokens · $6.01
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.2 · Visual quality 8.5 · Engineering quality 6.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt a282381696456fc9
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
7.2/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.7
Launch Day
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
38m 57s · 242k tokens · $7.20
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.5 · Visual quality 8.0 · Engineering quality 7.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 155b76cde8ba1880
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
6.7/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
6.0
Alex Optics
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
23m 51s · 143k tokens · $4.24
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 6.5 · Visual quality 6.5 · Engineering quality 5.0 · Usability / accessibility 5.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt e519ec9dadc0a186
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
5.6/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-sonnet-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
8.3
Afterburner
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
15m 38s · 101k tokens · $2.85
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 9.0 · Visual quality 9.0 · Engineering quality 7.5 · Usability / accessibility 7.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt e4ab4889f06802b1
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
8.5/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.4
Hangar Ops
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
1m 21s · 10k tokens · $0.34
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 7.0 · Engineering quality 8.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.5Fixed 9 of 10 bugs · 8 of 8 features still work · 86 lines changedscored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 86adb1d1b1c125c3
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
8.6/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
7.9
Rotor Rampage
claude-opus-5-5 · effort: high
19m 41s · 124k tokens · $3.96
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.6 · Visual quality 8.7 · Engineering quality 6.8 · Usability / accessibility 6.6scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 2db3f721e5dfca4a
Open the pageDetails
Earlier evaluations
7.5/10 · engineering-1 · claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (engineering-1 rubric)
Different rubrics; these values are historical, not a score change.
meta/muse-wondereffort: max
Meta · 6.9 / 10 · Quality v1 · 5/6 pages · 57m 25s · ≥≈$10.84 partial quality coverage
7.4
Aero Lab
meta/muse-wonder · effort: max
7m 05s · 33k tokens · ≈$1.33
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 7.5 · Engineering quality 7.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.5scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 1e8e809e8caeb2ba
Open the pageDetails
6.5
Jet Odyssey
meta/muse-wonder · effort: max
8m 33s · 35k tokens · ≈$2.06
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 7.5 · Visual quality 7.0 · Engineering quality 4.5 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 1ce617b6d67089b2
Open the pageDetails
6.5
Blast Island
meta/muse-wonder · effort: max
6m 39s · 43k tokens · ≈$2.01
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 7.5 · Visual quality 7.5 · Engineering quality 5.0 · Usability / accessibility 5.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt 28ba22cd0f56ca1e
Open the pageDetails
6.8
Launch Day
meta/muse-wonder · effort: max
24m 36s · 78k tokens · ≈$3.41
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 7.5 · Visual quality 7.0 · Engineering quality 6.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt d1e76d48a7ac8eb6
Open the pageDetails
7.3
Alex Optics
meta/muse-wonder · effort: max
10m 32s · 40k tokens · ≈$2.03
Quality v1 · Working behaviour 8.0 · Visual quality 7.5 · Engineering quality 7.0 · Usability / accessibility 6.0scored by claude-code/claude-opus-5-5 (quality-1 rubric)prompt de7c304e41dd3505
Open the pageDetails
Afterburner
meta/muse-wonder · effort: max
— · — tokens · —
Legacy rubric · Functional 0.0 · Visual 0.0 · Code 0.0 · UX 0.0 · Innovation 0.0prompt e08d0617005c33f9
Details